• DrFistington@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Don’t be disappointed. I guessed he was going to do this, and for good reason. His options were to either, live a life in fear, worrying that one day he would be caught, or, to basically give him self up, and elect for a Jury trial. Jury nullification is one os the most powerful tools available to the average, non-rich american. If he goes through the trial and gets acquited (which only takes 1 juror), then hes a free man, a folk hero, and he sets the precident that killing rich murderers isn’t an automatic crime.

    What he’s doing is the smartest available option, please donate to his legal defense fund.

    • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      and gets acquited (which only takes 1 juror)

      Unfortunately this is not true. 1 juror alone can hang the jury, but they’d have to convince all the other jurors to actually render a verdict of not guilty to avoid a mistrial

      • zephorah@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Have you ever been on a jury? In my experience it’s 2-4 strong personalities and a bunch of people confused by lawyer speak (because two confident authority figures are telling them to believe e two different things and they can’t reconcile the contradiction) and people who just want to go home and thus go along with the strong personalities.

        • Rogue@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Isn’t it always said that jurys are made up of people not smart enough to get out of jury duty.