• threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    10mm diameter

    Ah, so still not quite Cullinan-scale yet. Optical quality is probably better though.

    I’m surprised diamonds aren’t used more for lenses. Given its high index of refraction, it seems like an ideal material.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Yeah, the optical quality seems to be the main point. I assume there’s few fields where that level of precision is worth it though. I doubt we’re about to see it on an iPhone any time soon.