Trump has been charged by the Department of Justice with the following four counts:

  • A conspiracy to defraud the United States “by using dishonesty, fraud and deceit to obstruct the nation’s process of collecting, counting, and certifying the results of the presidential election,” according to the special counsel’s office.

  • A conspiracy to impede the Jan. 6 congressional proceeding at which the collected results of the presidential election are counted and certified.

  • A conspiracy against the right to vote and to have that vote counted.

  • Obstruction of, and attempt to obstruct and impede, the certification of the electoral vote.


In criminally charging former president Donald Trump for his efforts to reverse his 2020 election loss, federal prosecutors allege that Trump enlisted six co-conspirators to “assist him in his criminal efforts to overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 presidential election and retain power.”

  1. Rudy Giuliani

  2. John Eastman

  3. Sidney Powell

  4. Jeffrey Clark

  5. Kenneth Chesebro

  6. Unknown political consultant


Updated 8/3/2023 by Jordan Lund

Washington, D.C. - 4 felonies, January 6th Election Interference

Investigation

Indictment

Arrest <- You Are Here

(Lawyers have until 8/10 to submit requested trial dates, which will be announced on 8/28)

Trial

Conviction

Sentencing

Georgia - Election Interference

Investigation <- You Are Here

2 new grand juries were impaneled on 7/11/2023.

Indictment - July 11th to September 1st.

(Grand Jury work expected July 31 to Aug. 18)

Arrest

Trial

Conviction

Sentencing

New York State - 34 felonies, Stormy Daniels Payoff

Investigation

Indictment

Arrest <- You Are Here

Trial - March 25th, 2024

Conviction

Sentencing

Florida - 40 felonies, Federal documents charges

Investigation

Indictment

The original indictment was for 37 felonies.

3 new felonies were added on July 27, 2023.

Arrest <- You Are Here

Trial - May 20, 2024

Conviction

Sentencing


Other grand juries, such as for the documents at Bedminster, have not been announced.

The E. Jean Carroll trial for sexual assault and defamation, where Trump was found liable and ordered to pay $5 million before immediately defaming her again, resulting in a demand for $10 million, is not listed as it’s a civil case and not a criminal one.


Sources:


Trumps 3rd Indictment - Conspiring to Defraud the United States - 1 August 2023

NBC News: Grand jury charges Trump in 2020 election probe: Highlights

Vox: Trump was just indicted for trying to steal the 2020 election

CNN: August 1, 2023 Trump indicted in special counsel’s 2020 election interference probe

Washington Post: Here are the Trump co-conspirators described in the DOJ indictment

Reason: Trump Indicted for Attempting To Overturn 2020 Presidential Election

FiveThirtyEight: All Of Trump’s Indictments Could Seriously Bog Down His Campaign


Trump’s Arraignment - 3 August 2023

AP: Trump is due to face a judge in DC over charges he tried to overturn the 2020 presidential election

C-SPAN: The Not Above the Law Coalition, a group of organizations in support of accountability for those who opposed certifying the 2020 election results, holds a press conference ahead of the arraignment of former President Donald Trump.

C-SPAN: Coverage of the arraignment of former President Trump, stemming from Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into election interference. The former president is facing four criminal charges, including conspiracy to defraud the United States.

CBS News: Trump pleads not guilty to federal charges in special counsel probe

Chicago Tribune: Trump pleads not guilty to federal charges that he tried to overturn the 2020 election

The Independent: Trump appears to stumble over his name and age at arraignment


Official Documentation

Read the indictment by @mateomaui@reddthat.com

  • Wrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have a conservative leaning (they mostly call themselves libertarian) who aren’t exactly pro Trump, but anti liberal.

    I find it extremely weird how anti Trans they are, considering they’re accepting of homosexuals in a “sure, whatever, doesnt bother me” and “might have an acquaintance or two that are gay” kind of way. But the idea of Trans people existing somehow threatens their children really is prevalent in that group.

    They grew up in an environment where gay acceptance was pushed hard in school and society, and they seem to be on board because of it. But changing ones own genitalia somehow bypasses all of those lessons.

    It’s maddening how they fall for this rage bait bullshit that their media pushes.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they are anti-trans then the “libertarian” schtick is just obfuscation and authoritarian virtue signaling.

      • Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Definitely. I think the libertarian branding is more just an excuse to not be blamed for the actions of the republican party. “I didn’t vote for them, I voted independent”.

        But yes, their brand of libertarian is “I should have the freedom to enroll Mt kids in a school that represents my morality, even if that morality is stripping away rights of someone else”

      • Narauko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s become so bad that my local/state Libertarian candidates last election were further right than many of the Republicans with almost the same talking points. Who can we protest vote for now that supports gun rights, freedom of/from religion, abortion rights, gay marriage, and targeted/effective limited government that only provides for national defense, interstate commerce, and the common good through a UBI and national healthcare funded with a fair proportional tax? The party has left the actual libertarians behind.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Libertarian party has never been libertarian as far as I’m concerned.

          If you keep looking for perfect candidates over a dozen issues, you will never find anyone to vote for. My main concern is that a candidate not be a corporate tool. It’s amazing how all the other issues tend to fall in place when a candidate isn’t bought.

          • Narauko@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            110% with you there, but since bribery and graft is legal in the US only corporate tools get selected by the corporate parties. This is further reinforced by keeping the 2 party system entrenched with FPTP voting. I know I’ll never get perfect to vote for, but I’d like to at least get an option that would earn a C+ or higher to vote for.

            • Tinidril@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I feel exactly the same. However, I’ve come to believe that the answer isn’t in the politicians, it’s the people. The people do ultimately have the power to fix it, but most are too ignorant, apathetic, or caught up in conspiracy theories. Local networks and door to door drudge work are probably the best answer we’ve got.

    • phillaholic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m convinced they are terrified of finding a trans woman attractive. From time to time the ones “Ok with Gays” are only ok with the flamboyant stereotype. Find a Traditionally Masculine presenting gay man and they get weird around them too.

    • Gnubyte@lemdit.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      When I hear Libertarian I immediately think of liberals. Which is funny because I’m old enough to remember when the republicans would call people who liked freedom, smoking weed and voting for Bernie a liberal as an insult. You hear “libtard” a whole lot less nowadays because there really wouldn’t be much room to distinguish between the two.

      • squiblet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        They did their absolute best to turn “liberal” into a slur. Definitely on purpose - one of the ways Fox anchors manipulate people, for instance, is to make exaggerated displeased faces and sneering or disdainful tones of voice when they say certain words or discuss certain ideas or people.

        Anyway, I think that’s why some people chose to start using the term Progressive.