• lemmyshmemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did you read your own source?

      The current conclusion of the State Department lawyers does not constitute a judgment that genocide did not occur in Xinjiang, but it reflects the difficulties of proving genocide, read the report.

      • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So the global hegemon with the ability to spy on a single square foot of the earth from space 40 years ago is struggling to prove a conjecture that would harm its geopolitical rival, not because the claim lacks evidence and is politically motivated, but because proving this shit is hard? Is that what you’re saying?

    • exscape@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why link to a Chinese site? Link to a US .gov site instead if you want to talk about the US position.

    • bender@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But anyway, this article is about America’s extrajudicial Muslim torture camps

      Oh, then maybe you should delete this post and give it the correct title.

      • ☭ Blursty ☭@lemmygrad.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Too late now. The wheels are in motion. It would be unfair of me to waste all the effort people have already put in.

        • bender@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then I guess the people will just have to discuss the topic as written, and talk about China’s detention and torture of Muslims. Glad you’re bringing attention to it!

          • ☭ Blursty ☭@lemmygrad.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            But there won’t be anything to discuss about it, except maybe the complete lack of any credible evidence. We could discuss Sasquatch man instead I suppose, since there’s far more evidence for him.