Lemmy Today
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Nils@feddit.de to Technology@beehaw.org · 2 years ago

Google's New Web Environment Integrity Proposal Dismissed by Brave, Mozilla, and Vivaldi

news.itsfoss.com

external-link
message-square
106
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • firefox@lemmy.ml
  • firefox@lemmy.world
  • technology@lemmy.world
  • tech@kbin.social
975
external-link

Google's New Web Environment Integrity Proposal Dismissed by Brave, Mozilla, and Vivaldi

news.itsfoss.com

Nils@feddit.de to Technology@beehaw.org · 2 years ago
message-square
106
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • firefox@lemmy.ml
  • firefox@lemmy.world
  • technology@lemmy.world
  • tech@kbin.social
news.itsfoss.com | 520: Web server is returning an unknown error
news.itsfoss.com
external-link
  • meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Lmao, no. Google is out of their minds. Apple has zero interest in controlling browsers or ads.

    https://money.cnn.com/2017/08/31/technology/business/apple-net-neutrality/index.html

    • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      100
      ·
      2 years ago

      From the article:

      “We work hard to build great products, and what consumers do with those tools is up to them — not Apple, and not broadband providers,” Cynthia Hogan, VP of public policy at Apple

      Prove it, then. Unlock the bootloader. Allow us to install our own apps. Let us install our own OS on the hardware. I get they don’t want to open source their iOS, that’s fine. They say “what consumers do with those tools is up to them”, but then they lock those tools down TIGHT. Actions speak much louder than words. They say those tools are ours? They need to show us that this is true.

    • shrugal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m sorry to disappoint you, but this is basically the same thing: https://blog.cloudflare.com/eliminating-captchas-on-iphones-and-macs-using-new-standard/

    • sik0fewl@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 years ago

      Then what’s this? https://httptoolkit.com/blog/apple-private-access-tokens-attestation/

      • meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        A part of Apple’s long term, multi-stage deployment to phase out passwords entirely. They announced it last year during WWDC and said it will be messy and not without hurdles, but they’re committed to having strong cryptography without need for password at all.

        Related: https://www.wired.com/story/apple-passkeys-password-iphone-mac-ios16-ventura/

        A far cry from what Google is trying to do or their long term plans (we all know Google is trying to siphon more ad revenue).

        Google’s proposition is as bad for Apple as it is for the rest of us.

        • that_one_guy@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          2 years ago

          Honest to god doublethink right here.

          • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s crazy when I see it. And I see it far too often these days.

        • aberrate_junior_beatnik (he/him)@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 years ago

          Passkeys (which are broader than just Apple) and this are not related at all. Regardless, Apple absolutely has interest in controlling browsers. Hell, they already do it on iOS, where you can’t use any rendering engine other than theirs.

          The only reason they might be against this is because they feel they can’t control it the way they want.

        • RandoCalrandian@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Curious how this push comes after fairly set standards that passwords can’t be compelled

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I don’t think it’s related at all. You can implement passwordless technologies like FIDO2 and Webauthn without browser attestation.

          A far cry from what Google is trying to do or their long term plans

          It’s literally very similar technology though, and none of us know Apple’s long-term plans for it. It’s well-known in the digital ad industry that Apple are trying to increase the size of their ad network. Locking down tracking (app tracking transparency) is also advantageous to them as it only applies to third parties - Apple can still track users.

    • Karlos_Cantana@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      https://httptoolkit.com/blog/apple-private-access-tokens-attestation/

Technology@beehaw.org

technology@beehaw.org

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Free and Open Source Software
  • Programming
  • Operating Systems

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 530 users / day
  • 1.24K users / week
  • 3.06K users / month
  • 7.69K users / 6 months
  • 145 local subscribers
  • 38.6K subscribers
  • 4.15K Posts
  • 85.1K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.org
  • TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
  • gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
  • rs5th@beehaw.org
  • coldredlight@beehaw.org
  • Leigh@beehaw.org
  • TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
  • Chris Remington@beehaw.org
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org