makeasnek@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoChat Control 2.0: EU governments set to approve the end of private messaging and secure encryptionwww.patrick-breyer.deexternal-linkmessage-square124fedilinkarrow-up1684arrow-down19file-textcross-posted to: foss@beehaw.orgeurope@feddit.deprivacyguides@lemmy.onetechnology@lemmit.online
arrow-up1675arrow-down1external-linkChat Control 2.0: EU governments set to approve the end of private messaging and secure encryptionwww.patrick-breyer.demakeasnek@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square124fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: foss@beehaw.orgeurope@feddit.deprivacyguides@lemmy.onetechnology@lemmit.online
minus-squareADTJ@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 year agoYou’re unfortunately also handing people distributing csam a way to verify whether their content would be detected by checking it against the database
minus-squaremilicent_bystandr@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoYes, though doesn’t client side scanning do that anyway? Or must the client side scan be completely secret and also only communicate to law enforcement/whatever secretly?
You’re unfortunately also handing people distributing csam a way to verify whether their content would be detected by checking it against the database
Yes, though doesn’t client side scanning do that anyway? Or must the client side scan be completely secret and also only communicate to law enforcement/whatever secretly?