makeasnek@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoChat Control 2.0: EU governments set to approve the end of private messaging and secure encryptionwww.patrick-breyer.deexternal-linkmessage-square124fedilinkarrow-up1684arrow-down19file-textcross-posted to: foss@beehaw.orgeurope@feddit.deprivacyguides@lemmy.onetechnology@lemmit.online
arrow-up1675arrow-down1external-linkChat Control 2.0: EU governments set to approve the end of private messaging and secure encryptionwww.patrick-breyer.demakeasnek@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square124fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: foss@beehaw.orgeurope@feddit.deprivacyguides@lemmy.onetechnology@lemmit.online
minus-squarewhoisearth@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 year agoI’m sure they will tell you it’s weighing the security (against terrorists, criminals, etc) of the many against the security (from seeing dick pics or messaging a mistress) of the few.
minus-squareArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoThe thing that always kills me about that phrase is “the needs of the many” are “the needs of the few,” because “the many” is just a gaggle of “fews.”
I’m sure they will tell you it’s weighing the security (against terrorists, criminals, etc) of the many against the security (from seeing dick pics or messaging a mistress) of the few.
The thing that always kills me about that phrase is “the needs of the many” are “the needs of the few,” because “the many” is just a gaggle of “fews.”