• Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    The whole Russian project was to have our “polite society” collapse as we, as Americans, lost all faith in our institutions and turned against one another and in the process, also lost any kind of collective identity, which makes us a weaker target externally. That happened.

    It’s crazy to me, looking back, how much this was openly discussed along the way, as it successfully happened in slow motion over the last 10-15 years - wasn’t there also a book released that just laid their strategy bare? If there are historians in the future, will be amazing to read the perspective on all of this with time and analysis from those not trapped within the cycle of death and hopelessness.

    • Infomatics90@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yes it is called the foundations of geopolitics, written by Aleksandr Dugin. Its free to read on the internet archive.

    • Denidil@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It works because those of us who read and learn about things like this are a minority of the population. Not one large enough to counteract the effect either.

      • crimsonpoodle@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I think our society in reality is fine mostly; gun sales to conservatives under the Obama administration surged due to their fears at the time; now it happens again just in reverse.

        The key problem is that the internet is separating people and allowing foreign actors and cynical domestic interests to create filters of what people hear and see.

        you count yourself among a learned few then you should go out and create local events and spread local news as much as possible. People need to interact outside of their bubbles more and they would come to see mostly that they are both reasonable. It is only the facts that are current in question between the two isles, not necessarily the principles.