Welcome to a new era of interconnected content discussion with PieFed – a link aggregator, a forum, a hub of social interaction and information, built for the fediverse. Our focus is on individual control, safety, and decentralised power.


Like other platforms in the fediverse, we are a self-governed space for social link aggregation and conversation. We operate without the influence of corporate entities – ensuring that your experience is free of advertisements, invasive tracking, or secret algorithms. On our platform, content is grouped into communities, allowing you to engage with topics of interest and disregard the irrelevant ones. We utilise a voting system to highlight the best content.


Video introduction the codebase

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh my… I’ll eat my words about python maintainability. No unit tests, no emulation tests (with emulated services), no tests with a database, no formatter, no linter, no type hints, simple pip… The result is working, but I’m a little bit concerned about the nigh complete lack of testing and though they use an ORM (SQLAlchemy), I find the raw SQL therein (even if it’s simple) concerning.

    Besides that, the end result looks quite usable and it’s nice to see an alternative to lemmy.

    Anti Commercial-AI license

    • Andrew@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah the lack of test suites really kicks our arse sometimes. I changed it from hard-deleting to soft-deleting stuff recently, and I forgot to check whether a post actually links to an external URL when restoring a post. The first time someone restored a post without one, it decided that it now had 189 cross-posts (i.e. all the other text posts that week). Whoops!

    • Rimu@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yep, this Python-based project has no tests but not because it’s written in Python, lol

        • Rimu@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Pretty much.

          It’s a hobby project so we work on things we find fun or interesting. To me, tests are neither of those.

          • ex_06@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Rimu I love your approach to mod tools!

            Sorry if I ask this but now that Lemmy has extism plugins, wouldn’t it be better if you tried to extend lemmy with your python skills rather than keeping to build from 0? Would help the fun even more I think (?)

          • hono4kami@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            This was my experience with personal projects too.

            Unit tests hinder progress so much. End-to-end/integration tests are often flaky.

            The thing is, I still want to test my own project, because it’s a good idea to validate whether or not your code works or not…

            • Rimu@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              BTW I recently added the database structure for post licenses and have PeerTube video licence information being saved into the DB when they federate to us. However there is no UI that will let people specify a license for their PieFed posts or comments. The UI needs to present a list of licenses to choose from and reading about all the different ones made my eyes glaze over.

              You might like to start there as it seems to be an interest of yours!

              • onlinepersona@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                I feel like I’m getting nerd-sniped 😄 Believe it or not, writing tests, adding type hints, adding a formatter and linting, are actually more interesting to me than UI-work 😇

                I’ll see if I can make some time this week, but no guarantees!

                Anti Commercial-AI license

            • Rimu@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Yes we could really do with all of those. Patches welcome. Other than a preference for PEP 8 I don’t have strong opinions about particular linters or formatters.

              I see the benefits of types but am not puritanical about it. I’m ok with the way we’re using types at the moment. Most utility functions have types specified, especially those that return database objects so the type information flows up to the routes pretty well. I mostly see it as a way to help my IDE autocomplete work better than as a holy grail. I’m sure there are places where more types could be added but making it a policy that every function must have a type signature seems OTT.

              • logging_strict@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                To keep it simple

                testing and static type checking – catches all the bugs

                linting and formatters – so git diff isn’t pure noise showing trailing and unnecessary whitespace and collaborators won’t have to go back to correct things that coulda been automagically fixed.

                in code documentation – Can be extracted by Sphinx as part of the documentation process. Hint: interrogate is your friend.

                gh workflows – to have the test suite run against various py versions, os, and maybe architectures. Without which not even confident it runs well on your own machine let alone anywhere else.

                requirements.txt – is an output file. Where is requirements.in ??

                xz hacker sends his love

                Makefile – for people who like a ton of shell scripts in their Python packages. Up until realize that ya know which Python interpreter is being run, but can’t have any level of confidence about the shell interpreter. Cuz it’s a big unknown and unknowable. Gotta just take it on faith.