Summary

A 24-hour general strike in Greece on Wednesday shut down transport, schools, and government offices as workers protested high living costs.

Unions are demanding a 10% pay raise and the return of holiday bonuses cut during Greece’s financial crisis.

They accuse Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis of not doing enough to tackle inflation, despite recent minimum wage increases.

Hospitals operated on emergency staff, while protests and marches were planned.

Many say wages have not kept up with the rising costs of energy, food, and rent.

  • LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Europe is facing population decline. Houses should get cheaper, not more expensive, and the fact that prices keep rising means that they are artificially inflated.

    • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      2 days ago

      the second anyone was allowed to use houses as an “investment” to gain wealth we basically guaranteed this. obviously anyone with a lot of money tied up in housees is going to try and make their value go up. once we got multinational billion dollar conglomerates involved it became child’s play for them to make that number go up through infinite methods of varrying complexity carried out by thousands of people working together with billions of dollars behind them.

      this problem is inherent to a housing market that people are allowed to speculate on. we just need to make that stop entirely. limit house ownership. no one needs 100 houses. especially not companies. if that results in less rental houses than desired, we need to build more apartments. apartments are different beast, but if the cost of houses are lower then it will be harder to inflate rent if they can afford a house instead. this may result in some people who want to rent a house, but not an apartment, unable to find that. that’s not a big problem. they might just need to rent an apartment instead. certainly it’s much less of a problem then the current state of no one being able to afford housing.

      the rich don’t need this vector for growing their wealth. they have enough others and are doing quite alright at it. the world will function just fine without mult billion dollar corporations investing in buying properties for the sole reason that they think they can extract wealth without contributing anything. houses should be for living in, not for extracting wealth.

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Hear hear.

        We need tax on every home owned beyond the first, getting progressively higher with each one owned. For individuals and especially for corporations.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Alas, it’s not trivial to move houses from deserted villages into booming cities. Plenty of European cities already have anti-speculation and rent controls in place, it’s not really helping.

      Quickest and cheapest option would be to expand public transport actually, I think, spread out the pressure, combined with more remote work. Once you’ve got a steady, if overall tiny, de-urbanisation trickle going on urban prices are going to tank.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Facing” sounds like its a bad thing

      "Europe is responsibly decreasing their population "

      • Hoimo@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It is a bad thing, it’s not like they planned it ahead of time and prepared for the consequences of population decline. The entire system is designed around a growing population and if that growth turns negative, so does the government’s budget.

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Oh no, the economy!

          It doesn’t matter. You have more of everything you need. That’s all that matters.

          • Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            The total wealth is not an issue, but the distribution of it.

            My uncle in France had his retirement lowered to 90€/month. You can buy maybe two weeks of groceries for one person with that.

            • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Thats a social issue. There’s plenty of food. Just need a government to not intentionally starve people.

              Less population means even more food for everyone

              • Mrfiddles@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                20 hours ago

                Where do you think food comes from that having fewer workers means more food for everyone?

                • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  Do you really think food harvest is a highly specialized job requiring years of training?

                  You just need apercent of the population to do food. Again, this isn’t a problem. And if it ever was a problem, its a social problem.