Apparently, Bunnings have my face on-file. I don’t think I like that.

  • quokka@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’m getting sick of having to explain to people that “i’Ve gOT noTHIng tO HiDE” is naive bullshit when this comes up

    • Owljfien@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      33 minutes ago

      Doesn’t always work, but I ask if they shit with the door open. If they say no, I argue they have nothing to hide, everyone shits

  • Nath@aussie.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I wonder what percentage of Australians will have stepped into a Bunnings over the past three years? It has to be above 90% of us, right? That’s pretty close to a record of us all.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s all wesfarmers, and i’m pretty fucking sure that shit doesn’t stop at bunnings stores.

      • wildwhitehorses@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It is now rolled out to all Bunnings stores. So now when you steal something they don’t apprehend you, they store the footage and once you steal enough to get the cops involved they dump all that footage on the cops desk. People think they get away with stealing, time says otherwise.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    19 hours ago

    “Protection against organised crime” my arse you could give the fucking cops footage of someone breaking into your house and raping your hamster while shouting their full name and address and they still wouldn’t do shit.

    This is about floggable data

    • zero_gravitas@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I don’t think they were asking the cops to do anything, they just were refusing people service.

      But I agree with your conclusion. If they weren’t using the data for commercial reasons, they were using it as a deniable trial to see what they could get away with.

      Fucking Coles is using Palantir and has their checkout face cameras, so I suspect in the wake of this we’ll hear more about this sort of thing with other companies.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        My example was to highlight how utterly ridiculous their ‘reasons’ for capturing the data in the first place were. Not to mention none of it would stand up in court as evidence. Bald faced lie

    • zero_gravitas@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Article says they’ve got 30 days to publish it, and also that they’re planning to appeal, so that might delay it further.