• Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    bluesky has made better choices - the starter packs and user lists are great for new users. They managed to add quote tweets but let the quoted person opt out of dog piles. It looks like they added options for custom algorithms too.

    Bluesky will be enshittified but mastodon should be taking notes if they want to pick up people next wave.

    The bluesky system is just way better. The local/fed feeds on masto are just wasted.

    • BMTea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      What if we’re wrong and BlueSky just gets better? I mean, with some of the corporate trappings of old Twitter, but still user-friendly, big userbases, vibrant subcultures and banning troublemakers?

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I mean even if it repeats “the Twitter mistake” that’d still be another 13-14 years to go. Who knows where short-form social media will be conceptually in that time and whether any competition in the space is even still relevant.

      • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        It will, but it still has that countdown timer over its head.

        The future is the fediverse, some yet-to-be-invented non-corporate equivalent, or offline.

    • skrlet13@feddit.cl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Bluesky has useful tools. But (almost) all lists were made by the community of Bluesky users. Curation was made by users.

    • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The block lists for various types of assholes are also a marvellous invention. It’s so nice to block all of MAGA at a click