Summary

Two Pennsylvania voters, Austin Gwiazdowski and Jeanne Fermier, received $100 checks from Elon Musk’s pro-Trump “America PAC” despite not signing the PAC’s petition, which was required to qualify for payments.

The petition aimed to gather support for the First and Second Amendments and facilitate pro-Trump outreach.

Both voters expressed confusion and refused to cash the checks.

The PAC, funded by Musk, mailed 187,000 checks as part of efforts to boost Trump’s Pennsylvania support, while Musk’s political influence continues to rise.

  • Lennny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    We’re not going to handicap ourselves because you have an aversion for googling. Learn to research. It’s legal code…gee I wonder if a .gov link might be legit.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      You’re on a link sharing website saying you dont want to share links. Is this your first time on the Internet?

      Welcome, we share links here.

      • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s not that you asked for a link, it’s your low effort way of asking that implies you are already skeptical of the information.

        “Hey! I googled to look for it and I’m having a hard time finding where it officially says the statute. Mind sharing a link?”

        They probably would have said “No problem. Let me google that for you. Here…”

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’m not asking for me. I’m trying to let you know that you should always cite your sources. The link is something you should always provide when you quote something.

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            If you want to get into it, it’s links that aren’t acceptable as citations. I’m academically published and onto of the number 1 rules of citations is that links on their own are never acceptable sources because they’re ephemeral.

            When I cite a book or journal entry, edition, and page number, that source will still exist in the future even if tracking it down is difficult. If I had cited a link to a Geocities site or a page that was edited after my publication, future researchers wouldn’t be able to find my sources. Ever.

            Sometimes, you have to cite a webpage, but if you do you it needs to include date accessed, the name of the page (sometimes sites change their urls and the data can be sniffed out afterwards if you know to look for the organization), and the relevant data should be copied into an Appendix in case it disappears forever.