• Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Arming for self defense wont matter when the women in your life aren’t legally allowed to have a bank account.

    It will be death by a thousand cuts, but at least you’ll have your guns?

    • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Whatcha gonna do about it? And what does “at least you’ll have your guns” mean? Explain.

      • Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It means your guns won’t do shit when the law decides your mom is declared property.

        The guns won’t change anything because the people making those laws not only have guns but also have the police, the legislative, the judiciary, the military and the executive branch.

        Good luck fighting an apc full of military-decked police officers with your ar 15.

        • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Classic lib response, and still ignorant as fuck. On top of that it’s a classic case of pre-emptive compliance. See you in the boxcar.

          • Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Its wild to me how many people think they can stand against a military industrial complex funded to the tune of trillions of dollars.

            But hey, you can larp and pretend your 9mm is gonna save you.