• Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Lets put that maximum at $10M/month (or year). Now your counter argument doesn’t work any more.

    • piecat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I think we should be setting these max/min wages as relative values, not absolute values. Otherwise we have to pass laws every time the min wage needs to be adjusted. And we’ll end up with stagnation.

      For example, a person’s wage can only be X% higher than the lowest wage of someone a step below them in hierarchy. Including contractors and suppliers so they can’t skirt or find loopholes.

      There still might be some haywire incentives that require more thought, but it should hopefully encourage labor to be valued at an appropriate proportion of value. Either everyone makes good money, or nobody does.

      Should also probably deincentivize layoffs, stock buybacks, etc. at the cost of shareholder earnings / value.

    • Fl4k@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      but then businesses couldn’t run properly right? idk for sure but I feel like smaller businesses would be paid to a person and distrubuted to the company