Karna@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 day agoKDE's New Distro: Btrfs-Based, Immutable Linux OS, with Flatpak and Snaplinuxiac.comexternal-linkmessage-square113fedilinkarrow-up1221arrow-down16
arrow-up1215arrow-down1external-linkKDE's New Distro: Btrfs-Based, Immutable Linux OS, with Flatpak and Snaplinuxiac.comKarna@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 day agomessage-square113fedilink
minus-squareLemmchen@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up23arrow-down1·1 day agoIf it’s only there like in KDE Neon, I’m fine with it. I don’t want any of my distro apps to come as Snaps though.
minus-squareLavenderDay3544@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·17 hours agoWhy? What’s the issue with Snap? Is Flatpak any better?
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down3·9 hours agoYeah, Flatpak is far better. The most glaring issue: Canonical hosts the only Snap backend, you can’t host it yourself. Flatpak on the other hand is fully open. Don’t introduce proprietary crap just so companies can profit off of it.
minus-squareTMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 hours ago Don’t introduce proprietary crap just so companies can profit off of it. I agree but I think it’s the user who should be able to make the informed choice (ie. during installation)
Snap? Can we not?
If it’s only there like in KDE Neon, I’m fine with it. I don’t want any of my distro apps to come as Snaps though.
Why? What’s the issue with Snap? Is Flatpak any better?
Yeah, Flatpak is far better. The most glaring issue: Canonical hosts the only Snap backend, you can’t host it yourself. Flatpak on the other hand is fully open.
Don’t introduce proprietary crap just so companies can profit off of it.
I agree but I think it’s the user who should be able to make the informed choice (ie. during installation)