• pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s definitely plausible that the 8000% is because it was a comparison between off the shelf commercial dispensers, and ones that have to meet military and aviation specifications.

    But, hopefully they fuck Boeing if it turns out they were defrauding the government.

    • silkroadtraveler
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Be willing to bet they were greasing their profit margins to an insane degree. I used to work at one of the slimy defense contractors (second tier right below the primes). There is this law called TINA (Truth in Negotiations Act). Anything under $2.5M required ZERO cost justification. So managers / directors would bump price right up to the ceiling regardless. Even when the TINA threshold was crossed, they had a bottomless bag of reasons to juice their margins beyond anything reasonable. The thinnest justification would work because the gov knew there was basically no competition left thanks to mergers, acquisitions & consolidation (that politicians directly benefited from). If there wasn’t some conflated or exagerrsted reason easily at hand, those in charge of approving the proposal would just say COVID supply chain inflation OR knowingly avoid ever pressing a supplier to reduce their inflated margins knowing they could present it as a reason for price increases. I never saw the gov extract any meaningful price concessions. It was just one giant cesspool of greasy contractors from top to bottom. Number go up, more bombs forever. So glad I’m out of that parasitic, death merchant industry.