mrmanagerA to Technology@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoX users report unlabeled clickbait ads that you can’t block or reportwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1639arrow-down139cross-posted to: technews@radiation.party
arrow-up1600arrow-down1external-linkX users report unlabeled clickbait ads that you can’t block or reportwww.theverge.commrmanagerA to Technology@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square82fedilinkcross-posted to: technews@radiation.party
minus-squareAutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoThis is the best summary I could come up with: Mashable reports that users on X, formerly known as Twitter, have seen unlabeled ads in their feeds while scrolling through the company’s mobile apps. When users tap them, they’re taken to other websites, with no way to block or report them. Unlike normal ads that are just posts from company X accounts and have an “Ad” label, these new ones have no account associated with them. If you’re just scrolling, the embedded image and clickbait-style text might make you think it’s just another post. A “profile” picture made from the embedded image completes the illusion. Neither I nor my colleagues at The Verge have seen the new ads in our own feeds. The original article contains 152 words, the summary contains 112 words. Saved 26%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Mashable reports that users on X, formerly known as Twitter, have seen unlabeled ads in their feeds while scrolling through the company’s mobile apps.
When users tap them, they’re taken to other websites, with no way to block or report them.
Unlike normal ads that are just posts from company X accounts and have an “Ad” label, these new ones have no account associated with them.
If you’re just scrolling, the embedded image and clickbait-style text might make you think it’s just another post.
A “profile” picture made from the embedded image completes the illusion.
Neither I nor my colleagues at The Verge have seen the new ads in our own feeds.
The original article contains 152 words, the summary contains 112 words. Saved 26%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!