• atan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    What an awful mischaracterisation. While the dislike feature may appeal to misanthropes, it also appeals to the much larger pool of people that are intelligent enough/respectful of their own time to understand the value of the feature in helping to avoid poor quality and misleading content.

    It really bears out in the results. For those who recall what old ratios looked like, for sufficiently popular videos, they still hold true with this plugin.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      i just think dearrow seems like the better choice for that purpose.

      • atan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        How so? Like/dislike ratios are a very quick and effective means of identifying problematic content. Clickbait titles and thumbnails are another issue - they aren’t a reasonable indicator of the quality of the content. It’s an emerging trend in an oversaturated environment in which even creators of high quality content feel the need to partake.

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          but like… the like/dislike buttons are there for the algorithm. they’re there to tweak your recommendations. always were. the problem with having the ratio visible is that people will brigade, and that “mainstreams” your recommendations, making them less useful. that’s why youtube removed the visible ratios. putting them back, and just for people with the plugin, means your recommendations will start to align only with the people who have the plugin. it literally becomes an echo chamber.