Cross-posted from ā€œToo Bad, So Sad, Too Late - McDonaldā€™s tells U.S. restaurants itā€™s not a ā€˜political brandā€™ after Trump visitā€ by @JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee in !news@beehaw.org


Excerpt:

Though President Donald Trump visited a Pennsylvania McDonaldā€™s location on Sunday, the fast-food giant is trying to stay neutral in the presidential race.

ā€œAs weā€™ve seen, our brand has been a fixture of conversation in this election cycle. While weā€™ve not sought this, itā€™s a testament to how much McDonaldā€™s resonates with so many Americans. McDonaldā€™s does not endorse candidates for elected office and that remains true in this race for the next President,ā€ the company said in an internal message viewed by CNBC and confirmed by a source familiar with the matter.


I havenā€™t eaten at a McDonalds since before covid, and I donā€™t really miss it.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    Ā·
    1 day ago

    As far as the politicizing goes, itā€™s mostly because most people donā€™t know what you just said. They see ā€œMcDonaldsā€ and donā€™t think of local franchises; they think Big McD (corporate/the whole company).

    I think the other point of controversy is that franchises typically arenā€™t allowed to sub-lease, so to speak, the name/brand. They represent corporate, basically, and anything theyā€™d do that may harm the reputation would not be viewed favorably by the higher ups. Iā€™m not clear on the franchise agreements, but it wouldnā€™t be out of the question for those to be revoked / refused to renew if a particular location was causing headaches for the main brand.