• wanderingmagus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    In that case, what is the line between “simply” hate speech and actual radicalization to terroristic acts and/or conspiracy to terroristic acts and/or incitement to terroristic acts? At what point does it stop being “someone should [violent act] the [slur]s” and become “I bought a gun and several mags and have been practicing for the [dogwhistle mass violence event], let’s [violent act] the [slur]s”? At what point does it stop being 4chan trolling and become all but admitting intention to commit the Christchurch shooting? A Stormfront discussion forum becoming outright planning for and incitement to a Jan 6th riot?

    • SirEDCaLot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      A better question is where is the line between ‘simply’ a controversial opinion and actual hate speech?
      Because if a platform is required by law to ban hate speech, that’s going to sweep up a lot of controversial opinions along with it.

      Is it ‘hate speech’ to express any negative opinion about an oppressed group? And if not, where do you draw THAT line?

      (if you want an answer to your original question I wrote one out but it’s somewhat long…)