mox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 2 months agoThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1203arrow-down12cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.secpp@programming.dev
arrow-up1201arrow-down1external-linkThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.commox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square56fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.secpp@programming.dev
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 months agoHonestly, i prefer that over minimal standard libraries where you need dotzens of changing depencies for the simplest stuff.
minus-squareTraister101linkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 months agoNah standard libraries are great but C++ has a lot of… cruft. Maybe don’t plonk a lot of Rust in there despite all the positives
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoSure, not saying C++ isn’t cluttered.
Honestly, i prefer that over minimal standard libraries where you need dotzens of changing depencies for the simplest stuff.
Nah standard libraries are great but C++ has a lot of… cruft. Maybe don’t plonk a lot of Rust in there despite all the positives
Sure, not saying C++ isn’t cluttered.