• momocchi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m sure its plausible, but I just have no faith left in them to stick to a date so would not be at all surprised to see it slip

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Genuinely though, they’re right I’m surprised it’s not a 2025 release date.

        2026 is plenty of time to finish an animation-heavy linear “CoD/Battlefield in space” campaign that is supposed to be feature complete and playable already.

        Squadron 42 is nothing like Star Citizen. It’s about as impressive as a 2004 Morrowind-lookalike single-player Elwynn Forest to Deadmines to Onyxia campaign with a preset character running around in a modified World of Warcraft engine, while the devs are struggling and failing to make 40 player raids and Alterac Valley possible.

        I’m not particularly interested in Chris Robert’s toy space opera, using SC’s fantastic assets to make a silly Top Gun space parody while SC fails to realize its actually interesting goals, like large scale combined arms “star wars” warfare in a completely open space and planetside theater where boarding capital ships is possible.

        I don’t see them stabilizing SC ever, it seems like it’ll never be playable by anyone without an incredible patience for bullshit and faff. I’m just $90 deep but I’ll be very happy if I’m wrong and my Arrow gets to see their grandiose galaxy.

        But SQ42? Sure. 2026 makes sense.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Man, you young folks must not have been around for E3, or all the various leaked E3 presentation builds of games over the years.

      You can pull off some amazing looking stuff with just scripting the hell out of everything and only showing what you want people to see. Toss in some obviously unfinished stuff to make it all look more legit.

      Gameplay “demos” that are not open to the public to mess with are just ad reel by another name.

      • Fades@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Did those games you’re talking about take gamers money first, and then subsequently failed to release much of anything for the next thirteen years?

        Kinda sorta not the same at all.

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      I heard the same bullshit about a 2016 release of SC. It’s nothing but copium. It’s laughably easy to show “gameplay” of a prepared show demo, even if nothing of the actual game actually existed. Roberts has done this so many times already.