John Richard@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 5 months agoTrump has taken the lead over Harris for first time in 538 forecast.projects.fivethirtyeight.comexternal-linkmessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up163arrow-down159cross-posted to: politics@lemmy.worldpolitics@beehaw.orgpolitics@lemmy.world
arrow-up14arrow-down1external-linkTrump has taken the lead over Harris for first time in 538 forecast.projects.fivethirtyeight.comJohn Richard@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square26fedilinkcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.worldpolitics@beehaw.orgpolitics@lemmy.world
minus-squareWren@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down7·edit-25 months agoSo based on their record over the past two years, it’s safe to say that whoever they assume to have the best odds of winning- it’s still going to be a whoever wins, wins. My point is… they’re not accurate.
minus-squareCoggyMcFee@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·5 months agoYou just fundamentally do not understand statistics and it’s tiresome
minus-squareTheKingBombOmbKiller@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·5 months agoWhat would accurate odds in the previous two presidential elections look like to you?
minus-squareWren@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·5 months agoVoting is the only accurate means to determine a president. This bullshit with odds and predictions muddies the water.
So based on their record over the past two years, it’s safe to say that whoever they assume to have the best odds of winning- it’s still going to be a whoever wins, wins.
My point is… they’re not accurate.
You just fundamentally do not understand statistics and it’s tiresome
What would accurate odds in the previous two presidential elections look like to you?
Voting is the only accurate means to determine a president. This bullshit with odds and predictions muddies the water.