• reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      As in “I gave it to you for free. And you overcharged everyone for it.”

      • BossDj@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        But let’s also be fair, as in “I gave it to them for free out of convenience while getting rid of the stuff that I’d feel bad just throwing away”

        • reddig33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          I wouldn’t say donating to Goodwill is convenient. It’s more convenient to just throw it away. And reduce/reuse/recycle is a good thing. The bad thing here is Goodwill is blocking the three Rs by marking up the price. Which means they will probably just throw it away eventually because no one will buy it for that. Hopefully they will at least send it to a garment recycler later so that it’s laundered and then shredded to either r make new clothing, or stuffing for pillows or boxing bags.

          • BossDj@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            That’s why I said “that I’d feel bad throwing away”.

            The stages for high end go like this: sent to “goodwill boutique” and/or listed online. Sent to cheaper local goodwill with markdown. Added to cheap-item-Sunday (for ones that still do that). Sent to bulk outlet (where people fill a bag and pay one price for entire bag or by the pound). Finally, recyclers

            So they don’t block it so much as delay I suppose. But they’ve gotten good at regionalizing their processes