• Norodix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 hours ago

    A study comparing the environmental impacts of various single-use beverage containers has concluded that glass bottles have a greater overall impact than plastic bottles

    But… but… Glass is not single use. That is the whole point. I don’t like this article.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      But… but… Glass is not single use.

      When used for mass-produced beverages it very much is. Hell, plenty of beverages still use disposable glass bottles today, and that’s not even getting into the fact that glass bottles use to be the standard, which is part of the reason why there’s so much nostalgia around them.

      In the same vein, plastic is not inherently single-use. If we’re comparing multi-use plastic and multi-use glass, then the same calculus applies.

      • reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        But in the meme it’s the kind of milk bottle you return to the store for $ and they wash and refill it. Not really covered by that study I don’t think

        glass bottles have a more damaging overall effect, largely because they are heavier and require more energy for their production.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 hours ago

      If you have single use bottles, aluminum like soda cans is lowest impact. But any reusable solution (meal, plastic, or glass) is much much better.