I don’t watch cable news and I don’t pay attention to Jeff Teidrich or whoever so I don’t know where this bullshit is coming from. At least one person responding is nominally anti-genocide, so I don’t think that’s the reason. Another came back with something about the funding bill for FEMA as if it’s a gotcha.

What’s their logic?

  • Bobson_Dugnutt [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    It is, however, connected in that it shows the priorities of current legislators.

    Yes, exactly. That’s what I meant, but I think people took it in a partisan way.

    Are you suggesting that if a party does not push legislation when they have control over both houses then they should never try to pass it in the future, or that conditions and opinions are not allowed to change resulting in a shift of priorities?

    Speaking for myself, if I was in charge of a political party that had just gained majority power, I’d have a plan ready to pass as much priority legislation as possible in that term, knowing that I could lose the majority at the next election. The Republicans understood this, which is why we’re still dealing with a lot of Trump’s executive orders and appointees.