Looks like UniversalMonk is just embracing and celebrating this obviously bullshit Green Party shitshow now.
But they’re not even voting for Jill! So the propaganda they post is okay.
I didn’t write the article, and I don’t think it’s propaganda.
If you feel its propaganda, you’re free to bring it up with the news org that produced the article. Thank you, friend! :)
But you posted it so you’re just as bad. I’m bringing I up to you.
I’m not voting for the Green Party. Thank you! :)
What woke-free candidate are you voting for?
I’m voting for Rachele Fruit, of the Socialist Workers Party. Thanks! :)
Oh man, are you really prepared to take on the responsibility of being the third person in the country to vote for her? That’s a lot on your shoulders, it could really turn the tide.
You might singlehandedly raise her percentage from less than 1% all the way up to less than 1%
Well if only 3 people vote for her, then there shouldn’t be any anger or worrying just because I posted an article. Right?
It’s a distraction, and you know it.
You were implying that she’s not getting enough votes to matter.
I don’t blame Nader so much for 2000 - it’s possible if he dropped out and endorsed Gore (who went very green in the environmental sense soon after) then Gore could have won, but I see the stopping of the recount of Florida and the issues with the butterfly ballots as bigger problems.
As for Ross Perot, I believe he did ensure a (Bill) Clinton win over Bush Sr, but since I swing Dem anyways this was a good thing.
In fact that kinda shows how unlikely 2016 would have been - since Bush Sr, how many times has the same party won the White House three times in a row? None. In fact it would have been rare before then too, as explained by https://www.thoughtco.com/two-consecutive-democratic-presidents-3368109
Of course 2024 is very different from 2016, and those differences lead me to be very optimistic, spoilers aside.
WTAP - Parkersburg News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for WTAP - Parkersburg News:
MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News
