• DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because it isn’t real. You aren’t “sideloading”. You’re simply installing apps. You’re not doing anything different, other than using a source that the big company does not like.

      • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        It needs a definition because it is a thing that happens though.

        You need to differentiate between installing from the app store and installing from other sources, you might not like the choice of word, but we need a word to define it.

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes but sideloading makes it sound like something dangerous to people that don’t know any better. This is by design.

                • Grimy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Go ask your mom who had to deal with your limewire phase in high-school if you can “sideload” apps on her phone.

                  You want sources or something, what are you expecting dude?

                  • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    I think any unknown phrase and method to install an app will be scary to a person who is that unknowledgeable about it. At that point there isn’t any phrase that you could use that wouldn’t sound sketchy to them, it isn’t the phrase that is the problem, it’s the fact that it’s unknown and the process is scary.

                    The people you are describing would still be skeptical even if you explained it to them (and they should be, since they likely don’t have the knowledge or resources to properly vet an application from an unknown source)

        • xavier666@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I guess we were all sideloading apps on Win 7 and other prev gens

        • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          It has a definition already, which is the same it always has been. And no, you don’t need to differentiate this. We’ve always installed applications from outside sources. Hell, until recently there weren’t even official app stores and shit. Locked down operating systems where you only get what the tech giant wants you to get is a very recent development in order to take control away from the user.

          • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            The reality is that there is a difference now, and it needs to be clarified. How would you, talking to another regular human being communicate to install an app that isn’t in the official app store succinctly? If you just tell someone to ‘install the app’ then you are doing a bad job communicating. Economy of language means that new words are going to form to distill common concepts.

            Package managers have existed for a long time, so the concept of app stores isn’t new and is actually generally the accepted solution by the open source community. It’s typically regarded as the safest way to install software as it comes with auditing and active management.

            Side loading does a great job at communicating what is being done, and it helps consolidate the various ways you actually install applications into a nice generic term.

            A store being locked down doesn’t really have much to do with the concept of side loading anyway, since a locked down device doesn’t support it in the first place.

        • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 month ago

          It did, you just did not accept the answer. Installing apps is just installing apps, regardless of its source. That’s it. Sideloading, just like jaywalking, makes it sound like you are doing something dangerous, something forbidden, something you should not do. The whole locking down of operating systems is to take control away from the user.

            • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              1 month ago

              Maybe look for someone else, because I really don’t have the time nor motivation for delusional internet arguments with willfully obtuse people. Edit: Downvoters might want to check their profile, because they’re doing the same shit to other people. Very clearly a troll.

          • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            Sideloading is a term that’s been around for decades, it’s not some made up word by tech giants to make people scared of installing apps.

            The term originates from a designation for transferring data between physical devices and was slowly adopted (because language is fluid) to its current definition (by people on forums like xda).

            This isn’t some conspiracy and Google and apple don’t need to use coded language to prevent you from side loading, apple for example just outwardly and bluntly forbids it.