On Wednesday, Sanders introduced six resolutions blocking six sales of different weapons contained within the $20 billion weapons deal announced by the Biden administration in August. The sales include many of the types of weapons that Israel has used in its relentless campaign of extermination in Gaza over the past year.

“Sending more weapons is not only immoral, it is also illegal. The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and the Arms Export Control Act lay out clear requirements for the use of American weaponry – Israel has egregiously violated those rules,” said Sanders. “There is a mountain of documentary evidence demonstrating that these weapons are being used in violation of U.S. and international law.”

This will be the first time in history that Congress has ever voted on legislation to block a weapons sale to Israel, as the Institute for Middle East Understanding Policy Project pointed out. This is despite the U.S. having sent Israel over $250 billion in military assistance in recent decades, according to analyst Stephen Semler, as Israel has carried out ethnic cleansings and massacres across Palestine and in Lebanon.

The resolutions are not likely to pass; even if they did pass the heavily pro-Israel Congress, they would likely be vetoed by President Joe Biden, who has been insistent on sending weapons to Israel with no strings attached.

However, Sanders’s move is in line with public opinion. Polls have consistently found that the majority of the public supports an end to Israel’s genocide; a poll by the Institute for Global Affairs released this week found, for instance, that a majority of Americans think the U.S. should stop supporting Israel or make support contingent on Israeli officials’ agreement to a ceasefire deal. This includes nearly 80 percent of Democrats.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I was curious as well, so I looked it up. Apparently he grudgingly supported the bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999, despite firmly opposing a similar action taken in 1995 with Croatia. He called the bombing borderline unconstitutional, but added that such an operation seemed necessary to prevent an ethnic cleansing.

          Not sure I would agree with the previous commenter since Yugoslavia doesn’t exist any more, so I doubt that a no longer in existence country has strong feelings about anything. I also believe the people would likely not want to reform a country that was created for them, especially since their actions in 1999 led to the country dissolving into two or three countries.

          • orrk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            the intervention in the Yugoslavian war in 1999 was the only moral answer. it’s like the trolley problem if the 5 people are replaced with several entire ethnic groups

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Well, he was also a part of blocking the military aid to Ukraine for all those months. But this one is good

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Hot take: Global geopolitics within the current rules as we understand it don’t allow for countries to genuinely respect each other as equals. Might will always be right on the global stage regardless of whether it should be that way. So when it comes to picking a global hegemon, the United States is really not a terrible choice compared with the alternatives.

          • escapesamsara@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            7 months ago

            Ukraine is not, objectively could not qualify before 2014 when it became good for the US war machine for them to qualify, and most importantly, NATO should’ve disbanded in 1991 when the sole reason for its existence fell.

            • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Yeah, our country is shitty. I get the main reason the US joined the allies had more to do with politics then ideology. But least some kind of good comes from the US backing ukraine.

            • boonhet@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              1991 when the sole reason for its existence fell

              Russia still exists so what are you on about?

              The soviet union doesn’t, but the power was always concentrated into Russia, and guess what, Russia wants their territory back now. The countries which existed under the USSR and never want Russian rule again? Russia sees them as rightfully theirs. I for one am glad to have NATO protection. And I’m glad something is being done to help our brothers in Ukraine, because they weren’t as lucky as we were, to join the EU and NATO.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      49
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s easy to rage against the machine on a moral pedestal. It’s harder to actually steer the machine in the right direction.

      To be clear, I am supportive of putting things to a vote even if there’s no chance it succeeds. Get the votes on record. I think that’s an important archive that can be used later in election season to hold politicians accountable for their votes.

      I like what Bernie and AOC are doing when they push for these kinds of votes.

      But make no mistake. They can only do this from a position of being unable to effect any change. Under normal conditions, moves like this poison the well and make others on both sides less willing to work with you.

      They have the luxury of grandstanding specifically because they have zero hope of garnering support.

      Someone like a president can’t really do something like this without completely burning their political capital.

      • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        64
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Someone like a president can’t really do something like this without completely burning their political capital.

        If only we had a president who is never going to hold office again and has nothing to lose right now… Damn our current pres is nothing like that

        • Wrench@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          You realize his actions have a direct impact on Harris’ campaign… right?

          • Keeponstalin@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            38
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            You realise Biden’s current stance on Israel is unpopular by a vast majority of the Democratic voter base, right?

              • Keeponstalin@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                That poll isn’t about any specific policy

                Polls:

                Quotes

                In Pennsylvania, 34% of respondents said they would be more likely to vote for the Democratic nominee if the nominee vowed to withhold weapons to Israel, compared to 7% who said they would be less likely. The rest said it would make no difference. In Arizona, 35% said they’d be more likely, while 5% would be less likely. And in Georgia, 39% said they’d be more likely, also compared to 5% who would be less likely.

                Quotes

                Quotes

                Quotes

                Majorities of Democrats (67%) and Independents (55%) believe the US should either end support for Israel’s war effort or make that support conditional on a ceasefire. Only 8% of Democrats but 42% of Republicans think the US must support Israel unconditionally.

                Republicans and Independents most often point to immigration as one of Biden’s top foreign policy failures. Democrats most often select the US response to the war in Gaza.

                • Hamartia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  But what if Trump and pals manage to stabilize their fascist state. You will never have another free election (Putin style instead of the propaganda of billionaires and theocrats). The whole world will be fucked and all on your coin toss.

                  It is for once too dangerous to leave to chance. You need to get Harris in, and Trump and the corrupt supreme justices in jail. THEN from the ground up build a new political party for the people and the planet.

                • That poll is about opinions on the US’s role, and says nothing about Israel.

                  It’s a poll about the US role in the ME w.r.t. Israel, the rest of the poll’s questions were also about Israel, this was just the question that I figured best represents how people feel about Biden’s handling of it so far.

                  The only reason I am considering voting for Trump in the fall (compared to the handful of reasons why I am considering Harris) is that four more years of chaos may finally destroy the American War Machine and the disaster that is American foreign policy.

                  Are you sure about that? Last time Trump was president we got Russia gearing up for an invasion of Ukraine and China posturing regarding an invasion of Taiwan as well. Neither of these conflicts have been or would be beneficial to humanity as a whole. It’s destroyed the ecosystem in Ukraine for example.

                  And suppose Trump does turn isolationist instead of going to war with Iran like he’s been trying to do. Do you think the resulting power vacuum will lead American voters to believe that going isolationist was beneficial? We saw the opposite in 2020 happen, where people wanted the US to return to the world stage by electing Biden.

                  Ideally, I want America to be a functional democracy that respects and promotes civil rights and liberties around the globe. […] Maybe a civil war will cause us to reassert what we claim are our values, and I’ll finally live in a country I can respect,

                  Have you considered that you might end up on the losing side? Republicans have always been war hawks. Them fully cementing their power through Trump could very well lead to an even more active US war machine. Trump won’t be around forever, he’s old and these days the target of assassination attempts.

                  Accelerationism has been tried in the past. It has never ended well. I urge you to really reflect on what it truly means if your envisioned scenario were to happen. I urge you to reflect on the many, many things that have to happen in order to end up somewhere better. And please, consider what happens if you’re wrong about what electing Trump will lead to.

                  I live in a country that’s been under the yolk of another whose population thought like you do, that maybe making things worse will make things better. It led to the worst environmental disaster we’ve ever known, caused the deaths of millions and led to the birth of the US war machine. The scars are still visible today.

                  I sympathize with you though. The US is in a shit place electorally speaking. Organizing for electoral reform is probably the best shot at fixing things, but that takes incredible time, effort and money to get through. I can see why that feels hopeless. But personally, I find it a more honorable cause. Endangering yourself and many others is in my opinion deeply irresponsible.

                • 0x0@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  You’re a weird American and i say that as a compliment. I hope there are more like you.

                  Please chose the lesser evil in November.

          • Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yes and Harris complicity in continuing the genocide in Gaza, the ethnic cleansing in the Westbank and now the invasion of Lebanon will be the greatest risk for her election. But they would rather hand over the US to Trump on a silver plate, than to stop killing Arabs.

    • infinitevalence@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      111
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Also just a little slow to come around to reality like always.

      Edit… Down vote all you want I’m still a big Bernie fan but the whole US government has been on the wrong side of this war from the beginning. We treat Palestinian lives just like black and brown lives at home like they didn’t matter.

      Lastly Hamas is not Palestinian I can support Palestinians and condemn Hamas.

      • takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        91
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        He was criticizing the response since the beginning?

        Frankly I was initially supporting them, as I am against Hamas but Israel lost the objective, didn’t destroy Hamas and didn’t get hostages out. So what was all that for?

          • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            what you said, even if were to be true, does not contradict what I said so your comment does not make any sense

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        7 months ago

        And doing so in a way that is going to accomplish almost nothing while antagonizing and alienating the people who would let him otherwise get positive legislature passed.