• ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    1 month ago

    didn’t tobacco companies once refute a causal connection between smoking and lung cancer?

    what else is he going to say? that he knows he’s profiting from pouring poisonous sludge into all our lives?

    • trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      And, even though Big Tobacco was obviously lying, they sewed enough doubt to keep the topic as an issue of debate for decades after we knew it was dangerous.

      Zuck is likely doing the same because it works.

      • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Oil companies too. Honestly, the tobacco industries bullshit is pretty foundational to any communications studies.

        It’s something we should all keep in mind when whenever we are subject to corporate communications/public relations.

    • PrimeMinisterKeyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Worse. They had these big, decades-long gaslighting campaigns, selling cigarettes as “good for you” because they “calm” you down, make you look cool and lower your blood pressure, etc.

  • MagnyusG@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Even if he was right, his word can’t be taken seriously because of his position. He’s never going to admit his product is actually detrimental.

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 month ago

    Tobacco exec: it’s not cancerous

    Oil exec: lead additives are safe

    Social media exec: no harm to your kids psychology

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 month ago

    ditching facebook sure improved my mental health. wasting time is one thing, but wasting it on infuriating bullshit is just fucking stupid

      • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        And events. I use it to follow a bunch of places that have musical events or drinking contests. But I don’t have a single friend, and I only check it once a week or so to see what’s coming up.

  • De_Narm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Wolf says there’s ‘no causal connection’ between him being there and a declining sheep population.”

  • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Mark Zuckerberg The Tobacco Industry says there’s ‘no causal connection’ between social media Smoking and teen mental respiratory health.

    There…fixed it.

  • Rivalarrival
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve read dozens upon dozens of claims that social media was harmful, and always dismissed them as Karen nonsense, “think of the children” bullshit, or “kids these days” boomer ignorance.

    Today, for the first time, I have started to believe there might actually be some truth to the idea.

    • Chefdano3@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      I would love to believe that, but instead I can’t help but believe a collapse of society would just put these people in an even higher level of control. They have the most starting resources, so they’ll have an advantage starting over, and with no rules or restrictions, it will be bad for everyone else.