• Rob200@lemmy.autism.place
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is a good point actually. That’s almost like trying to ban Naruto because it’s Japanese, but not banning Dragonball Z. We’l see where this goes. If they would enforce these law equally it wouldn’t be as much of a concern. Overall, whether they ban TikTok or not, if as a user you don’t like a said platform, just don’t use it.

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        9 months ago

        They desperately need to do something about car software before China starts being really relevant here in EVs too.

        I absolutely support massively restricting what anyone can gather, not just China, (and the same for social media/ad networks/retailers), but it’s fundamentally not the same threat as data vacuums controlled by an enemy state.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        pretty sure china can just buy all the info they want from facebook, twitter. If I recall a bunch of US secret military sites were exposed by apple watches

          • Fedizen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Sure, but a lot of that can easily be done via corporate proxies as well. After all its not hard to make a corporation in the US

            • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              After all its not hard to make a corporation in the US

              …A US corporation is subject to US laws.

              ByteDance is subject to Chinese laws.

              If TikTok wants to do everything that it’s currently doing, but under US law and under US scrutiny, they’re more than welcome to do so. But they’re currently evading any serious scrutiny. Hence the reason to shut them down if they refuse gov’t oversight.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        The fears, however reasonable you may find them, are largely that it presents a danger of foreign information gathering of detailed behavioral/location/interest/social network information on a huge swath of the U.S. population which can be used either for intelligence purposes or targeted influence/psyops campaigns within the U.S.

        Tbh, I’m troubled by my own government doing that to us.