🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 2 months agoAnon starts asking questionssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square109fedilinkarrow-up1699arrow-down113
arrow-up1686arrow-down1imageAnon starts asking questionssh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 2 months agomessage-square109fedilink
minus-squaredodgy_bagel@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 months agoEveryone is wrong. It’s the encabulation effect.
minus-squarengwoo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 months agoModern bicycles include an isotropic harmonization manifold to achieve the same thing without an encabulator.
minus-squaredodgy_bagel@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoHow do they account for side fumbling?
minus-squareBowtiesAreCool@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoWell they took 6 hydrocomptic marzel vains, and fitted them carefully to the ambiphasiant lunar wainshaft. This effectively prevents side fumbling.
minus-squaredodgy_bagel@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoI’m looking through google scholar and I can’t seem to dig up anything about this. Could you express the principle in terms of stilted Newton pentameter?
Everyone is wrong. It’s the encabulation effect.
Modern bicycles include an isotropic harmonization manifold to achieve the same thing without an encabulator.
How do they account for side fumbling?
Well they took 6 hydrocomptic marzel vains, and fitted them carefully to the ambiphasiant lunar wainshaft. This effectively prevents side fumbling.
I’m looking through google scholar and I can’t seem to dig up anything about this.
Could you express the principle in terms of stilted Newton pentameter?