• Traister101
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Significantly” Going by the comparison Sony felt large enough to brag about there’s hardly a noticeable difference

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      An uplift of ~45% in overall performance, ray tracing going from awful to decent, hardware-accelerated upscaling (like DLSS) isn’t “hardly noticeable” unless you don’t have eyes.

      And more storage and WiFi 7 may not be as flashy (hah, SSD storage, flash-y), but they’re nonetheless improvements.

      But, you know, if that’s not good enough for you, don’t get one. Nobody’s forcing you. I know I have no desire for one, (especially not for $700!) I’ve been console-free since my 360 had a red ring of death.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think the trick is that the normal PS5 is already $450 (no disc drive) or $500 (with disc drive).

        So do the features on the Pro version provide an extra $200 to $330 worth of value?

        So far, as a PS5 owner, I’m not seeing it.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Only if you don’t have one already. Some of the more intense games graphically have shit upscaling so they shimmer. If higher internal resolution can fix this while running at good FPS, it might be worth it for some people

          Remember that you still can’t build a gaming PC for $700 that performs similarly.