Very sleek stuff, but reading the analysis gives bad vibes - what is their deal? Trot stuff? Can someone give me a good workup (I’m lazy)?

  • Chronicon [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    yeah this is true. Jacobin might trend a bit wealthier than a similarly (small) sized general interest mag, and intelligentsia I would say applies to the majority of their writers regardless (as professors and think tank people,) even if though they probably aren’t wealthy. Article writing itself is generally not lucrative, and honestly neither is most levels of academia.

    It’d be convenient if they were just rich but I think they’re mostly genuine libs. It is probably still true that they would risk their jobs by advocating revolutionary actions

    • CantaloupeAss [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think there’s also simply the problem that magazine editors today will not print “I would like to behead my landlord”, and that magazine may not even be its own landlord to be able to print that. What makes it into published periodicals is not necessarily the most left thought the author or the editor has ever had.