• SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes a person specifically employed to find information who then reports said information is 100% the same as dumb shit you said on a playground.

    Exactly the same.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You have definitely not seen the hearing and it is beyond weird that you’d pretend otherwise on the internet.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The evidence and witness info provided have the committee members calling for a select committee with subpoena powers.

            When Grusch said “I can’t say that here” that was never going to be the end of that discussion

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                A select committee is not “every committee by default.” A select committee is a specific committee.

                Also you may want to revisit the last sentence of paragraph 1.

                And no, the entire hearing was credible.

                Frankly if it’s nothing, you don’t have to give a shit. The members of Congress think it’s something, and I agree with them.

                  • SCB@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Ohhh you wanna bet? What can we bet?

                    Loser posts a pic of them eating a pie! We can call it a “humble pie” bet.

                    Does Lemmy have remindmebot?

                    Fair warning tho: I’ll consider “Congress uncovers public/private embezzlement scheme” as a win too.