Yuritopiaposadism [none/use name]@hexbear.net to traingang@hexbear.netEnglish · 10 months agoLandlords are scum.hexbear.netimagemessage-square62linkfedilinkarrow-up1312arrow-down13
arrow-up1309arrow-down1imageLandlords are scum.hexbear.netYuritopiaposadism [none/use name]@hexbear.net to traingang@hexbear.netEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square62linkfedilink
minus-squarelemming934@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down9·10 months agoBecause it’s good for people to be able to rent a house, and we already subside home ownership enough in the US
minus-squareblindbunny@lemmy.mlcakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·10 months agoLandlords should take a bath with a toaster.
minus-squareRedDawn [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·10 months agoit’d be easier to rent a house if they weren’t all owned by a few rich people, silly
minus-squarelemming934@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoI mean the policy in question was to tax second homes at 10,000% Presumably that includes houses an organization wants to rent out. It’s hard to imagine that this policy wouldnt make it very difficult to rent
Because it’s good for people to be able to rent a house, and we already subside home ownership enough in the US
Landlords should take a bath with a toaster.
it’d be easier to rent a house if they weren’t all owned by a few rich people, silly
I mean the policy in question was to tax second homes at 10,000%
Presumably that includes houses an organization wants to rent out. It’s hard to imagine that this policy wouldnt make it very difficult to rent