• @jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    53
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Death by algorithm

    It’s inconsistently applied, there’s no appeal, but it’s cheap and you don’t have to hire human moderators… And Google does love things that have global scale, so even if it’s wrong, is it wrong enough for Google to care? No not at all

    The fact that there’s no feedback to the video owner is an indictment of the whole process.

    I genuinely believe Shadow banning should be antithetical to social media. Maybe even against the law. The most cogent argument I’ve heard in defense of shadow banning is, if people know their shadow banned, they’ll try to avoid the ban… This argument is the same as gaslighting, we think it’s better to gaslight people than to argue with them about the truth.

    • @cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1817 days ago

      On many sites you can find if you’re shadow banned just by trying to view your posts while logged out, so that breaks that defense of it.

      • @jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1117 days ago

        I don’t believe this, but I’m going to argue in favor of shadow banding argument here:

        Most people, even if they know how to check, won’t bother logging out to verify the post is banned or not banned. If somebody’s posting a lot of things, how would they even know one thing is banned? What would draw attention to it? Telling somebody hey this one thing you posted out of the 300 you posted yesterday is banned, will draw their attention, and they might work around the ban.

    • N3Cr0
      link
      fedilink
      English
      317 days ago

      What if I’m not interested in the majority watching my videos, but I still need a place to upload them? Correct me if I’m wrong, but a shadow-baned video should still be available through the URL. That way, it’s more on the private side.

    • @mods_mumOP
      link
      English
      -317 days ago

      100% agree. The audacity to call this shite cutting edge technology is hilarious :)

      • @jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        I think it is very good cutting edge technology. For YouTube, YouTube is optimizing for YouTube’s benefit.

        The problem is YouTube has no competition. If you can’t find what you want on YouTube, you’ll just watch something else… On YouTube.

        Enshitification if you like. There is no feedback loop to improve the quality of their search.

        • @huginn@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          617 days ago

          YouTube has no competition because nobody can make competition profitable.

          The barrier to entry is insurmountable. You have to operate at insane scales to turn a profit and you’d burn literal billions to get there.

  • Rentlar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4217 days ago

    Aww I feel bad for SungWon but I’m glad he has covered the slow and steady demise of YouTube one step at a time. He should do a whole history of the reddit, twitter, other social media’s enshittifications as a series of his skits.

  • DarkThoughts
    link
    fedilink
    1917 days ago

    The search sucks even if videos aren’t falsely flagged & hidden. You constantly have to wade through completely unrelated videos that have nothing to do with the search term (and nowadays also a bunch of spammy Shorts that just tag all trending shit), before you actually reach the videos you’re actually looking for. In the past you were able to use quotation marks to explicitly search only for the search terms between them, and nothing else, but that feature got quietly canned a while ago.