Google's digital whiteboard for schools and businesses lasted 8 years.
  • kae@lemmy.caEnglish
    52·
    1 年前

    The idea of the product is really great. The cost is prohibitive for all but major corporate customers.

    Add in Google’s track record of killing products… just like this… and why would you invest?

    Jamboard needs to be a tablet companion app first, and the hardware can follow. If they’re going to keep coming up with these halo products, then they need to support them for the long term. They also need to be willing to bite the bullet and give these away to lock people into Workspace because it’s unique and no one else does it.

    Now it’s another reason to not buy in.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      13·
      1 年前
      • Android
      • Drive
      • Docs
      • Translate
      • Material
      • Angular
      • Kubernetes
      • Flutter
      • Go
      • TensorFlow
      • Pixel

      And many others I miss. It’s a bit mind boggling how many things this corp has done. They have killed so many and there still so many yet, and many open source projects.

      • cnqr@beehaw.org
        1·
        1 年前

        I wouldn’t include Tensorflow in the list. Tensorflow’s dates are numbered too.

        Google internally all but switched to JAX.

      • SourWeasel
        1·
        1 年前

        As a heavy Docs user, I’m beginning to see lots of odd choices that they don’t seem interested in fixing that ultimately result in a somewhat broken product. For example, there are still loads of things that can only be done in Google docs for web, so on an Android device you are forced to try to get a browser to load Docs in desktop mode to make a handful of changes all while fighting the OS trying to move you over the native app that lacks the features you need. I have similar issues with Gmail. Then there are things like Google Home that have the opposite issue, forcing you to move to a mobile device or emulate one on the desktop just to change a few settings.

        And in some cases, their web vs. native app mentality makes zero sense to me. They actually built then removed the Google Shopping list Android app and now only have the web version, cause everyone shops with their laptop sitting open in the cart, right? /s I can use the web version on my phone’s browser, but then for some reason it wants to arrange my shopping list alphabetically rather than the order I chose that matches the store layout. Wtf? It also previously had clear color photos automatically added for every item that made it much faster to navigate, but they removed them completely without comment.

          • tsonfeir@lemm.eeEnglish
            1·
            1 年前

            I don’t think so.

            I’m not evil. Hey, can I see your contacts? It’s to find your friends… I’m not mapping who knows who and selling that data. I sweeeaaarrrr

    • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
      12·
      1 年前

      The dumb thing is it’s just using locked down android with some tweaks.

      So they could pretty easily just loosen some of the locks that shouldn’t have existed in the first place and let you still use it.

      Edit: I’m curious on the viability of getting a custom build on there. It would be cool if the community found a way to get these supported for the schools/organizations who are willing/able to deal with open source if that’s the only option, and interested parties could get their hands on the abandoned ones cheap. I’d definitely be interested in a slightly janky smart board.

      I wonder if sufficient community backlash could at least pressure Google to make the process more reasonable, like it did with Chromebooks getting longer support.

      • HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.oneEnglish
        3·
        1 年前

        Releasing the locks should tve the most basic courtesy. They spent all that money on the damn machine. It might as well be able to use it without your bullshit after you abandon it.🤷‍♂️

  • AbstractifyBot@beehaw.orgB
    8·
    1 年前

    My abstract for the linked article

    Google is discontinuing Jamboard, its $5,000 digital whiteboard product, in late 2024. Jamboard was a large touchscreen that integrated with Google Workspace apps, allowing collaborative work. However, Google found that Jamboard users were a small portion of its Workspace customers. It will shut down the Jamboard apps and hardware, leaving existing customers with useless devices. Google recommends migrating Jamboard data to competitors’ whiteboard apps like Figma and Miro. While Jamboard was expensive initially, its annual fees and integration with Workspace subscriptions resulted in total costs as high as $7,000 per year.

    The high recurring costs were not enough to sustain Jamboard long-term.

    This comment was generated by a bot. Send comments and complaints via private message.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldBEnglish
    6·
    1 年前

    🤖 I’m a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

    Click here to see the summary

    The digital whiteboard could be drawn on using the included stylus or your fingers, and it even came with a big plastic “eraser” that would remove items.

    The SoC was an Nvidia Jetson TX1 (a quad-core Cortex-A57 CPU attached to a beefy Maxwell GPU), and it had a built-in camera, microphone, and speakers for video calls.

    People not in front of the touchscreen could launch the “Jamboard app” instead, letting them get in on the whiteboard action remotely, complete with live handwriting.

    While Jamboard users make up a small portion of our Workspace customer base, we understand that this change will impact some of you, and we’re committed to helping you transition…" Yes, that’s right, “transition” is usually not something you have to consider when a company kills a hardware product, but the whole cloud system is going down, too, so all of your existing $5,000 whiteboards will soon be useless and you won’t be able to open the cloud data on other devices.

    Google seems to feel particularly bad for the schools that bought into this, saying, “We will also work directly with educational institutions to compensate them for their Jamboard devices.”

    People often ask about a recurring revenue stream when predicting what products will live and die, but even a $600-per-year fee attached to every sale wasn’t enough to keep Jamboard running.

    Saved 64% of original text.