• Lightor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    So you care about format, not content? And you rely on a crowd sourced wiki for unbiased information. Dear Lord.

      • Lightor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Unbiased and neutral can easily be used interchangeably here, anyone with common sense could crack that code bud.

        Jesus dude, you honestly need to talk to someone. You legit seem to have a narcissism problem.

        • Aurix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          You imply I think Wikipedia is per default unbiased and all truthful which it isn’t and I stated clearly otherwise with “quite difficult to be neutral”. So I am not sure where the misunderstanding comes from.

          Bad rep for going down the personal route in a discussion.

          • Lightor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I believe you when you say you’re not sure.

            Bad rep for going down the personal route in a discussion.

            You come at my reading comprehension then try to high road the convo. Dude, you’re displaying every characteristic of someone who is chronically online. Take a breath and reflect lol.