https://t.me/tacticool_burger/2455

The skid+fpv connection is already becoming our crown jewel in infantry work.

The Svoboda battalion works

4BrOP of NSU.

🇺🇦☠️

  • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Okay, so because they didn’t “actively” show they were retreating that changes the rule of engagement on combatants vs potential POW?

    -seriously asking, not sarcasm or baiting.

    • Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      The military objective is to reduce the enemies ability to wage war. Inflicting military casualties is a legitimate means to that end otherwise any and all weapon use would be a warcrime. Efficacy is not a concern in this regard. In fact ethically speaking, the precision drones allow is an improvement over almost all other weapons (even bullets miss and strike civilians hundreds of meters away).

      By continuing to hold a weapon even retreating troops (which these 2 aren’t doing in the clip ftr) maintain their status as an immediate threat which makes them fair game, and in the fog of war even throwing down a weapon isn’t enough because they likely have a sidearm and/or grenades.

      • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Okay yea that makes sense, I’ll do some more research on the topic to see what the rules are for this kind of thing.

        Thank you for taking time to explain this where others would just downvote, shit talk and ignore.