TehBamski@lemmy.world to Atheism@lemmy.ml · 9 months agoBook Clubi.imgur.comexternal-linkmessage-square125linkfedilinkarrow-up11.13Karrow-down140
arrow-up11.09Karrow-down1external-linkBook Clubi.imgur.comTehBamski@lemmy.world to Atheism@lemmy.ml · 9 months agomessage-square125linkfedilink
minus-squareindex@sh.itjust.worksBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down42·9 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareNuke_the_whales@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up25·9 months agoYou can’t have a serious discussion with a person who follows a millennia old book
minus-squareindex@sh.itjust.worksBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down9·9 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareNuke_the_whales@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 months agoLol spelling errors aren’t a great way to try and play smart
minus-squareslickgoat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up24·9 months agoOh, and that’s what the other side is pursuing - a serious discussion? Spare us. The other side is out for blood. No discussion is detailed in Project 2025.
minus-squareindex@sh.itjust.worksBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down15·9 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareslickgoat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·9 months agoIs US politics not related to this post? I mean, in any way?
minus-squareindex@sh.itjust.worksBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·9 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down12·9 months agoIf we swap the word “bible” for “lawbook” does your opinion change?
minus-squareexplodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·9 months agoIf we had it all active laws in one book, that would be a huge step in the right direction.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·9 months agoAgreed. “Ignorance of the law is not an excuse” is currently impossible to correct.
Removed by mod
You can’t have a serious discussion with a person who follows a millennia old book
Removed by mod
Studied*
Lol spelling errors aren’t a great way to try and play smart
Oh, and that’s what the other side is pursuing - a serious discussion?
Spare us. The other side is out for blood. No discussion is detailed in Project 2025.
Removed by mod
Yes.
Is US politics not related to this post? I mean, in any way?
Then why did you do it?
Removed by mod
Ironic. 🤣🖕🏽
If we swap the word “bible” for “lawbook” does your opinion change?
If we had it all active laws in one book, that would be a huge step in the right direction.
Agreed. “Ignorance of the law is not an excuse” is currently impossible to correct.