• Soup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Right but that’s a choice the shelter can make and not a point against the idea that people, ultimately, won’t really refuse a place to sleep. It’s a more complex issue that takes more time than an evening so rules like “no being drunk” which sound fine don’t really help anyone.

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’d imagine it’d help make the unhoused who don’t want to have to deal with drunk people feel a lot safer about using them.

      • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        So what are the people who depend on alcohol supposed to do? They aren’t allowed to have seizures and go through withdrawal there either.

      • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        and if you want to use public money on it, then the goal has to be to help them get back to society, to which dealing with problematic behavioral patterns, like substance abuse, is a necessity…

          • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            What’s your point? They should continue drinking themselves to death?

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              You let them continue until they can get a spot in a medical setting where they can safely withdraw.

              • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago
                1. that safe setting may very well be the shelter we are talking about

                2. you are steering away from subject. it is absolutely fair to tell them “being homeless and nuisance in the street is from now on illegal. either you want help to get back to society and then you will accept the help with its terms - you are really not in a position to make demands - or you can move to some unabomber cabin in the middle of nowhere, and there you can do whatever you want”

                • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  No, alcohol withdrawal can cause seizures and death. A shelter is not a safe place, especially because they won’t have alcohol for emergencies.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  So you want to create an alternate society in the wilds?

                  Well that’s one I haven’t thought about since the last time I read Brave New World and thought, good thing we’d never do that.