The all-American working man demeanor of Tim Walzā€”Kamala Harrisā€™s new running mateā€”looks like itā€™s not just an act.

Financial disclosures show Tim Walz barely has any assets to his name. No stocks, bonds, or even property to call his own. Together with his wife, Gwen, his net worth is $330,000, according to aĀ reportĀ by theĀ Wall Street JournalĀ citing financial disclosures from 2019, the year after he became Minnesota governor.

With that kind of meager nest egg, he would be more or less in line with theĀ median figureĀ for Americans his age (heā€™s 60), and even poorer than the average. One in 15 Americans is a millionaire, a recent UBS wealth reportĀ discovered.

Meanwhile, the gross annual income of Walz and his wife, Gwen, amounted to $166,719 before tax in 2022, according to their joint return filed that same year. Walz is even entitled to earn more than the $127,629Ā salary he receivesĀ as state governor, but he has elected not to receive the roughly $22,000 difference.

ā€œWalz represents the stable middle class,ā€ tax lawyer Megan Gorman, who authored a book on the personal finances of U.S. presidents, told the paper.

  • SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    Ā·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    They said his net worth. Youā€™re upset about not talking about his pension. You donā€™t list your pension in your net worth, just like you donā€™t list your take home pay in your net worth. Your net worth is the total after adding up your total assets and subtracting your debts/obligations.

    If this is new information to you then I apologize for my tone in the other comments. The point is there is nothing omitted or neglected. This number is accurate as-is.

    • fadedmaster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      Iā€™m not upset. The other commentor might be. But Iā€™m not.

      I guess I always thought you included retirement accounts in net worth because they carry a cash value even if it hasnā€™t been cashed out yet. Just like you would include shares in a company in someoneā€™s net worth even if they hadnā€™t sold the shares.

      Perhaps pensions are slightly different. Everyone I work with who opted for the pension over a 401k includes their pension in their net worth and, to my understanding, so do the financial planners that work with the Union.

      • SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        Ā·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        A pension is not a retirement account, itā€™s an income stream. Itā€™s completely different from 401kā€™s.

        Itā€™s not an investment account, itā€™s payment. The institution keeps paying you at regular intervals after youā€™ve left. As an income stream it is not part of your net worth, just like folksā€™ hourly wages/salary are not part of their net worth. Social security is another example - not net worth, not an investment account, but an income stream delivered at regular intervals.