• Hannes@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    Isn’t that how silicon valley worked for years even within itself? Run a loss for long enough until you’ve overtaken the market and then raise prices when the competition has lost their edge.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s what China is trying to do with their EVs in other markets right now too as another example.

      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yet you still see people grumbling about how restrictions on chinese EV imports are just “American/Western Imperialism”, since people apparently don’t understand how valueable domestic production is

        • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s because the USA floods countries with cheap goods all the time and then cries foul when someone else does it. It’s pure hypocrisy.

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            What cheap goods does the US produce and flood other countries with? Even in the US, most of our products are made in China.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              US Agricultural goods are heavily subsidized and, thanks to NAFTA, flooded Mexico’s markets and destroyed farmers’ livelihoods.

            • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Well, Facebook, google spring to mind. They are both cheap for the consumer and undermine local competition. Digital goods can be dumped too.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cloud was never supposed to be “cheap”. It has always been a utility based model where you pay for how much you use it. The problem is, way too many people used is as a 1:1 replacement without rearchitecting their workloads, so of course it’s gonna be more expensive.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not just that, but the big value proposition was supposed be that you wouldn’t need sysadmins. In practice, these services are so complex that you need a dedicated skill set to use them, except now it’s specific skills for each provider that aren’t directly transferable.

      • Laser@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which means you can sell support in addition to the service itself. Mission accomplished!

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not to mention the benefits of having vendor lock in, since migrating to a different service becomes prohibitively expensive.

  • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Uber was always more expensive then a taxi, at least in NYC/London. It was originally marketed as a “luxury” transportation option. The cloud was always ~2x more Operation Expenses with the value proposition that you didn’t have any Capital Expenses so if you were a startup it was easier to sell-out and get started with lower risk. Streaming is still cheaper then cable, but it is getting shittier.

    • Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Streaming is still cheaper than cable

      That really depends on where you live. With my current provider here in the Netherlands, I would be paying 12.50 euros extra for TV.

      Netflix standard is already more expensive than that at 13.99.

      • kindenough@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Realdebrid serves torrents instantly from torrentio at 3 bucks a month. Nvidia shieldtv Pro is the best media steamer (*in my opinion which is probably worthless). I had Apple TV’s running Stremio, but it was a pain in the butt syncing, so I gave those away.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    A primary purpose of technology under capitalism is the violent control of people and the planet. Any actual progress is an unwanted side effect.

  • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been adding a bunch of torrent-focused features to both lemmy-ui and jerboa this week, the next releases of both should have them.