I’ve seen several people claim that their state’s vote for the US presidential election doesn’t matter because their district is gerrymandered, which does not matter for most states.

Most states use the state’s popular vote to determine who the entire state’s electoral college votes go to. No matter how gerrymandered your district is*, every individual vote matters for assigning the electoral vote. [ETA: Nearly] Every single district in a state could go red but the state goes blue for president because of the popular vote.

*Maine and Nebraska are the notable differences who allot individual electors based on the popular vote within their congressional districts and the overall popular vote. It’s possible there are other exceptions and I’m sure commenters will happily point them out.

Edit: added strikethrough to my last statement because now I have confirmed it.

Of the 50 states, all but two award all of their presidential electors to the presidential candidate who wins the popular vote in the state (Maine and Nebraska each award two of their electors to the candidate who wins a plurality of the statewide vote; the remaining electors are allocated to the winners of the plurality vote in the states’ congressional districts). (source)

  • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 months ago

    But if you live in a state that is overwhelmingly one party, your states votes are going to go to that candidate. I live in California, and there not much chance that any California delegates are going to go to Trump. True, the districts didn’t matter for the EC votes, but that doesn’t mean everyone’s vote counts the same.

    Also worth mentioning that the number of votes each state gets is based on very outdated logic.

    It would be different if there were no EC and it was decided based on the national popular vote.

    • BuelldozerA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Also worth mentioning that the number of votes each state gets is based on very outdated logic.

      The logic is basically sound but we borked the shit out of the system with the Re-Apportionment Act of 1929.

      That needs to repealed / replaced / updated with something like the Wyoming Rule.

    • Reyali@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      True, some states are too extreme to ever flip. Then other states like Texas or North Carolina are perceived as firmly in one camp, but they might not be if everyone actually voted.