• menixator@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Related announcement: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/privacy-preserving-attribution

    TLDR: Mozilla wants your data and it’s opt out. If you’re on FF 128 it’s already on and you will have to turn it off manually. Shame how they have fallen this low. The LEAST they could have done is show a pop up announcement when the user upgraded to 128.

    Also: +1 to Librewolf. Mozilla is definitely going to try more scummy crap like this in the future. Definitely the better option over Firefox.

    • Paradachshund
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Maybe I’m misunderstanding, but I just read that whole article and it sounds like a good implementation? Companies want to know how effective their ads are, and I like their approach of trying to find a way to provide this without wholesale personal data collection. They even say at the end that they don’t get the data either. It sounds like a reasonable thing to try and standardize.

      • menixator@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m not commenting on implementation itself but rather on how Mozilla went about with an opt-out approach into the collection program (even if it was for testing) to a community they have cultivated with the promise of privacy.

        Collecting my data is a big deal. It doesn’t matter how it is used. I should at least consent to it.

        • timestatic@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I feel like this argument is fair enough. I think a pop-up informing the user about it and how to opt out is sufficient.

        • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          So long as it survives rusts complexity and lack of portability. I’m always down for more options!

          • a Kendrick fan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            rust is complex and non-portable?

            i’ve never heard of this, do you mind explaining what you mean better?

            • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              You joking? 😆 I don’t want to discourage you from giving rust a try but come on. Have you ever talked to a developer that spent any real time with rust, anyone that got as far as multi threading?

        • timestatic@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Looks really cool. I hope we don’t have the overreliance on one rendering engine in the future. Once one or the other comes out I’ll definitely try it out.

        • Zorro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Wasn’t Firefox supposed to incorporate Servo in some way or another before Quantum was developed?

    • Zacryon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve read the announcement. Sounds reasonable and sufficiently private to me. So saying “Mozilla wants your data” sounds misleading and like an overreaction to me. Also might help to mitigate the arms race in privacy protection versus tracking for ads and worse stuff.

      Mozilla is definitely going to try more scummy crap like this in the future.

      How do you know that?

      Even if, there will still be alternatives. But right now, Firefox is the best browser with regards to privacy and security. It even passed minmum ratings by the german IT security authority, contrary to other widely used browsers.