• simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux-

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s the problem, though: a lot of it isn’t GNU, specifically because GNU stuff is GPLv3 and would thus stop the smart TV and IoT device makers from Tivoizing everything all to Hell. Most of that stuff is running bastardized Linux, not GNU/Linux!

        • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          Off the top of my head:

          • Android and its derivatives, and other distributions based on ToyBox (if any exist, I don’t know)
          • Alpine and other distributions based on BusyBox
          • Chimera
    • silkroadtraveler
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      A name is just a simple reference to a system composed of interrelated and essential OS components: Kernel, windowing system, networking tools, virtual memory, user interfaces, the list goes on…

      Yes GNU is an essential suite of tools but so is X (or Wayland) and many other unnamed yet critical subsystems.

      Now GPL licensing on the other hand, THAT is a foundational precept to FOSS that deserves sole credit back to a single project.

      • JATth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        The NT kernel in isolation is apparently quite “ok”, from what i have heard of it. It’s the spyware, malware, driver crap (“windows”) running on/using it which is unquestionably totally fucked and disgusting. If they were to FOSS the NT kernel, I could maybe support an such endeavor.