• rekorse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    If you think polling is that reliable be my guest. Noones trying to force you to be reasonable.

    • FiniteBanjo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      You have selective vision, I wonder if optometrists can do anything about that?

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think his point is not that polling is supremely reliable, just that it is more reliable than the article here, which is entirely based on one person’s gut feeling about what they randomly see (and want to see). Florida may not be a lost cause , but it’s also not something to get your hopes up too much over. The polling is at least a decent relative indicator that FL is a much more uphill battle than other states with a closer polling margin.

      • rekorse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I understand the point but people are trying to change “more accurate than a gut feeling” to “the best predictive tools we have”, which betrays how accurate they are.

        I’m not sure anyone here would defend the methodology of these polls but they keep referencing them constantly.

        I understand we have nothing else, but maybe we just can’t predict the future as well as we think we can.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          “the best predictive tools we have”, which betrays how accurate they are.

          I understand we have nothing else

          Yes, we don’t have anything better, so they literally are the best predictive tools we have. It’s just that all our tools suck. If you see someone say “Florida is now a Harris state based on a couple of rallies I’ve seen” it’s more than fair to counter with “polls show Trump has a sizeable lead there”, particularly when you compare with polls run the same way in other states and use it as a rough relative indicator of Trump v. Harris bias between states, even if the absolute values are likely to mismatch the result.

          • rekorse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            How is that any different than two people arguing about who’s right about a math problem, where one is trying to cook their way to the answer, and the other is trying to crochet their way to the answer.

            Neither of them are ever going to be right, neither side should be using those tools to solve that problem.

            Maybe you can explain to me all of the benefits we gain from pre-vote polls?