• HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    The Crusaders didn’t do a fraction of what Muslims did during their actual initial conquest.

    The Crusaders killed every man, woman, and child in Jerusalem until the streets were flowing with blood.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Go read something on

      what Muslims did during their actual initial conquest

      . This was casual for them. The difference is, though, that Crusaders didn’t intentionally destroy books and art.

          • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I hope you’re just really misinformed and not just really racist but you should take a quick stroll to your local library, buy a few history books and look around.

            Christianity has been far more brutal and repressive for a lot longer than pretty much every other religion out there.

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I’m Armenian, so I know you’re bullshitting me in the context of the Middle-East. We are not talking Americas and Africa here.

              • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                What does that have to do with anything lmao

                King Leopold murdered ten million Congolese. The British empire 100 million Indians. The dutch started the slave trade.

                • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Which doesn’t change anything in the conversation that started about “the Islamic world” being built on the conquest of more civilized peoples, which were mostly Christian.

                  Also I’m fine with reducing Christians to “middle-eastern Christians” here. Others don’t seem really Christian from there anyway. For these reasons as well:

                  King Leopold murdered ten million Congolese. The British empire 100 million Indians. The dutch started the slave trade.

                  Only I think the Portuguese started the slave trade. Not that it changes anything.

                  • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Pretty sure Persia, India, and China all had great empires and knowledge well before Christianity was even a little sperm cell in the Judean god’s sac but sure

                    Which btw most of foundational mathematics was created in the Eastern and Persian world, not by Christians. And it was from there that the Greeks got their knowledge. To the point Pythagoras was not the one who created or realized the Pythagorean theorem, it was just named after him because of the western world. And that was a couple thousand years before Christianity existed.

                    The literal word Algebra comes from Al Jebra and his works.

                    So yeah you’re just racist and misinformed.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          I know what I’m talking about, but I get furious over Westerners trying to find indulgence for their own ancestors’ actions at the expense of Middle-Eastern native Christians, and I see saying that Crusaders were somehow worse than any Muslim conquest as part of that.

          Being furious I may sometimes say something imprecise.

          Doesn’t negate the fact that Islam is not native to any place outside of the Arabian peninsula, and those areas it has invaded still have native populations and religions not yet completely exterminated, and those are largely Christian. Saying that Crusaders were the baddies, but the Muslims whom they were fighting were not, is disgusting in that context. It’s like that “Irish were like slaves too”, putting things into American context so that you’d understand better.

          Same as that myth of Salah ad-Din being benevolent and honorable, mostly started by German Empire’s propaganda as part of their relations with genocidal Ottoman Empire.